Abstract
Facebook has become a pivotal platform for political propagandists. Since it can be used as a very convenient medium. Facebook, a political participation and conversation center, keeps becoming Bangladesh’s most popular social networking site. This study explores how Facebook usage influences the political perceptions of Bangladeshi people during the 2024 general election campaign. By focusing on a specific demographic (e.g., age, parliamentary constituency, gender, occupation), the study investigates relationships between Facebook interactions, exposure to political content, and their influence on shaping political opinion. Using a mixed-methods approach, findings suggest that interaction with political figures and exposure to diverse political content can shape public perceptions. However, the emotional and often spontaneous nature of reactions highlights the nuanced role of Facebook as a tool for political engagement and discourse.
References
Al-Dbeisi, Ali, A. K., Al-Tahaat, & Yassin, Z. (2013). The Role of Social Media in Forming Public Opinion among Jordanian University Students. Studies, Humanitarian and Social sciences, 1(4), 66–81.
Alodat, A. M., Al-Qora’n, L. F., & Hamoud, M. A. (2023). Social Media Platforms and Political Participation: A Study of Jordanian Youth Engagement. Social Sciences, 12, 402. doi:10.3390/socsci12070402
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow, Groups, Leadership, and Men (pp. 222–236). Pennsylvania: Carnegie Press.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. (2015). Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160
Bär, D., Pierri, F., Morales, G. D., & Feuerriegel, S. (2023). Systematic discrepancies in the delivery of political ads on Facebook and Instagram. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.10001
Barberá, P., Jost, J., Nagler, J., Tucker, J., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0956797615594620
Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.
Blumler, J., & Katz, E. (1974). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. doi:10.1111/jcom.12166
Calderaro, A. (2018). Social Media and Politics. In The SAGE Handbook of Political Sociology.
Cantijoch, M., Cutts, D., & Gibson, R. (2015). Moving slowly up the ladder of political engagement: A ‘spill-over’ model of Internet participation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(1), 26–48.
Capozzi, A., Morales, G. D., Mejova, Y., Monti, C., & Panisson, A. (2023). The Thin Ideology of Populist Advertising on Facebook during the 2019 EU Elections. International World Wide Web Conference 2023 (pp. 2852–2862). New York: Association for Computer Machinary.
Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2016). Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Parties and Election Campaigns: Party Decline or Party Renewal? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 283–293. doi:10.1177/1940161216646731
Dahl, R. A. (1991). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. Holt Publishers.
Dimmick, J. w., Sikand, J., & Patterson, S. (1994). The Gratifications of the Household Telephone: Sociability, Instrumentality, and Reassurance. Communication Research, 21, 643–663. doi:10.1177/0093650940210050
Dudovskiy, J. (2022). The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: A Step-by-Step Assistance. In Research Methodology.
Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2014). Social Media Update 2013. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-Media-Update.aspx
Elliott, W., & Rosenberg, W. (1987). The 1985 Philadelphia Newspaper Strike: A Uses and Gratifications Study. Journalism Quarterly, 64(4), 679–687. doi:10.1177/107769908706400
Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. California: Stanford University Press.
Fujiwara, T., Müller, K., & Carlo, S. (2024). The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidece From the United States. Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(3), 1495–1539.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the News-Finds-Me Perception in Communication: Social Media Use Implications for News Seeking and Learning About Politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12185
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y.-l. P. (2010). Predictors and Consequences of Differentiated Practices on Social Network Sites. Information, Communication & Society, 13(4), 515–536. doi:10.1080/13691181003639866
Heatherly, K., Lu, Y., & Lee, J. (2016). Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and likeminded discussions on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1271–1289. doi:10.1177/1461444816634677
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51–60.
Khan, M. (2017). Social Media Engagement: What Motivates User Participation and Consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 236–247. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024.
Lazer, D., Rubineau, B., Chetkovich, C., Katz, N., & Neblo, M. (2012). The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes. Political Communication, 27(3), 248–274.
Lee, C., & Ma, L. (2016). News Sharing in Social Media: The Effect of Gratifications and Prior Experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 331–339. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Brace and Company.
M. Alodat, A., Al-Qora’n, L., & Hamoud, M. A. (2023). Social Media Platforms and Political Participation: A Study of Jordanian Youth Engagement. Social Sciences, 12(7), 402. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070402
Mahmud, A. (2017). Use of Social Networking Media in Political Participation: A Study on Dhaka University Students. Sociology and Anthropology, 5(6), 481–488.
Morris, M. (2015). Research on Evaluation Ethics: Reflections and an Agenda. New Directions for Evaluation, 31–42. doi:10.1002/ev.20155
Napoli, P. (2015). Social Media and the Public Interest: Governance of News Platforms in the Realm of Individual and Algorithmic Gatekeepers.”. Telecommunications Policy, 39, 751–760. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The Spiral of Silence Public Opinion — Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Onwuegbuzie, A . J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A . G. (2009). A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
Palys, T. (2008). Purposive Sampling. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2, 697–698.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. (2010). Predictors of Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 175–196. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press.
Pew Research Center. (2023, March 08). Retrieved March 08, 2023, from www.pewresearch.org: https://www.pewresearch.org
Prior, S., Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., & Shearer, T. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(3). doi:10.1177/1744987120927206
Rubin, A. (1981). An Examination of Television Viewing Motivations. Communication Research, 8, 141–165. doi:10.1177/0093650281008002
Sajid, M., Javed, J., & Warraich, N. F. (2024). The Role of Facebook in Shaping Voting Behavior of Youth: Perspective of a Developing Country. SAGE Publications, 14(2).doi:10.1177/21582440241252213
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. Köln Z Soziol, 107–131. doi:10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Sultana, N. (2020, October 19). https://www.tbsnews.net/thoughts/blackout-movement-bangladesh-performance-social-responsibility-146932. Retrieved from https://www.tbsnews.net/: https://www.tbsnews.net/thoughts/blackout-movement-bangladeshperformance-social-responsibility-146932
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Tang, G., & Lee, F. L. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: the impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763–773.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Valenzuela, S., Piña, M., & Ramírez, J. (2017). Behavioral Effects of Framing on Social Media Users: How Conflict, Economic, Human Interest, and Morality Frames Drive News Sharing: Framing Effects on News Sharing. Journal of Communication, 67(18). doi:10.1111/jcom.12325
Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N. (2017). Computational Propaganda Worldwide: Executive Summary. University of Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política (Portuguese Journal of Political Science)