A Ciência Política e a Crise da Democracia


normative approach
Political Science
crisis of democracy

How to Cite

Fonseca, P. (2020). A Ciência Política e a Crise da Democracia. Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa De Ciência Política, (13), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2020.13/pp.69-86


The paper explores the connections between Political Science and democracy facing the current global crisis of democracy. At a time when it is required that Political Science take the lead in the research about the crisis of democracy, focusing on its causes and consequences, the paper developed three main and interrelated arguments. First, since that democracy was crucial for the birth, autonomy, and evolution of Political Science in Western countries, the paper argues that this favoured the development of a normative research agenda committed with democracy and its promotion. Secondly, it is argued that this research agenda largely downplayed the risk of a weakening of democracy or even the possibility of a democratic retreat in the Western democracies. Thirdly, the paper argues that the deepening of the crisis of democracy in several Western countries, until recently classified as consolidated democracies, may threaten the Political Science discipline profile developed in the West over several decades. Consequently, this fact also helps to understand the difficulty in conceiving a political science neutral and normatively uncommitted with democracy.



Ahram, A. I., & Goode, J. P. (2016). Researching Authoritarianism in the Discipline of Democracy. Social Science Quarterly, 97(4), 834–849. <https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12340>.

Alexander, A. C., & Welzel, C. (2017). The Myth of Deconsolidation: Rising Liberalism and the Populist Reaction (ILE Working Paper Series No. 10). Hamburg: University of Hamburg. Retrieved from <http://hdl.handle.net/10419/170694>.

Almond, G. A. (2003). Political Science: The History of the Discipline. In R. E. Goodin & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science (pp. 50–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press. <https://doi.org/10.1093/0198294719.003.0002>.

Almond, G., & Coleman, J. (1960). The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Alt, J., Chaambers, S., Garrett, G., Levi, M., & Mcclain, P. (2011). Introduction. In G. T. Kurian (Ed.), Tje Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. lx–lxvi). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Bates, R. H. (2011). Development, Political. In B. Badie, B.-S. Dirk, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 644–648). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959636.n149>.

Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. <https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012>.

Berndtson, E. (1991). The development of political science: Methodological problems of comparative research. In D. Easton & J. Gunnell (Eds.), The Development of Political Science: A Comparative Survey (pp. 34–58). London: Routledge.

Camerlo, M., Cristo, A. H., & Koçak, C. (2017). Ciência Política e Política Comparada em Portugal: O Balanço de uma Experiência Recente. In C. P. Teixeira (Ed.), O Sistema Político Português: Uma Perspetiva Comparada (pp. 41–65). Parede: Principia.

Cancela, J., Coelho, T. D., & Ruivo, J. P. (2014). Mapping Political Research in Portugal: Scientific Articles in National Academic Journals (2000–2012). European Political Science,13(4), 327–339. <https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2014.18>.

Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 6–21.

Cassani, A. (2012). Hybrid what? The contemporary debate on hybrid regimes and the identity question. In XXVI Convegno SISP - Breakdown of the Authoritarian Regimes and Democracy (pp. 1–30). Roma: Società Italiana di Scienza Politica . Retrieved from <https://www.sisp.it/files/papers/2012/andrea-cassani-1445.pdf>.

Cassani, A. (2014). Hybrid what? Partial consensus and persistent divergences in the analysis of hybrid regimes. International Political Science Review, 35(5), 542–558. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512113495756>.

Cohen, A., Bernard, L., & Riutort, P. (2009). Qu’est-ce que la science politique? In A. Cohen, L. Bernard, & P. Riutort (Eds.), Nouveau manuel de socience politque (pp. 21–34). Paris: La Découverte.

Crick, B. (1964). The American science of politics: its origins and conditions. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Diamond, L. (1997). Is the Third Wave of Democratization Over?: An Empirical Assessment (No. 236). Retrieved from <https://kellogg.nd.edu/sites/default/files/old_files/documents/236.pdf>.

Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy : toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking About Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35. <https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0025>.

Diamond, L. (2020). Ill Winds: saving democracy from russian rage, chinese ambition, and american complacency. New York: Penguin Press.

Diamond, L. J., Plattner, M. F., & Walker, C. (Eds.). (2016). Authoritarianism goes global : the challenge to democracy. Baltimore,: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Doyle, M. W. (1997). Ways of war and peace : realism, liberalism, and socialism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Duverger, M. (1972). Introdução à Política. Lisboa: Estúdios de Cor.

Eisenstadt, S. (2011). Modernization Theory. In B. Badie & L. Berg-Schlosser, Dirk Morlino (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 1608–1622). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959636.n365>.

Feedom House. (2020). Freedom in the world 2020; A Leaderless Struggle for Democracy. Retrieved from <https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/FIW_2020_REPORT_BOOKLET_Final.pdf>.

Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The Danger of Deconsolidation: The Democratic Disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–17.

Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). The Signs of Deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 8(1), 5–16.

Friedrich, C. J. (1947). Political Science in the United States in Wartime. American Political Science Review, 41(05), 978–989. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400260668>.

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, (16), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/24027184

Gilman, N. (2003). Mandarins of the future : modernization theory in Cold War America. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Gowa, J. S. (1999). Ballots and bullets: the elusive democratic peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gunnell, J. G. (2014). Political Science, History of. In G. Kurian (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 1278–1285). CQ Press. <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781608712434.n1203>.

Gunther, R., Diamandouros, N. P., & Puhle, H.-J. (1995). Introduction. In R. Gunther, N. P. Diamandouros, & H.-J. Puhle (Eds.), The politics of democratic consolidation : southern Europe in comparative perspective (pp. 1–32). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Huntington, S. P. (1965). Political Development and Political Decay. World Politics, 17(03), 386–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009286

Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Huntington, S. P. (1988). One Soul at a Time: Political Science and Political Reform. The American Political Science Review, 82(1), 3. <https://doi.org/10.2307/1958055>.

Huntington, S. P. (1991a). Democracy’s Third Wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0016

Huntington, S. P. (1991b). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Hurtig, S. (2012). Political Science, International Institutionalization. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, & L. Morlino (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 2013–2019). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959636.n459>.

Kahin, G. M., Pauker, G. J., & Pye, L. W. (1955). Comparative Politics of Non-Western Countries. American Political Science Review, 49(04), 1022–1041. <https://doi.org/10.2307/1951390>.

Keohane, R. O. (2009). Political Science as a Vocation. Political Science and Politics, 42(2), 359–363.

Klesner, J. (2011). Modernization. In G. T. Kurian (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 1048–1052). Washington DC: CQ Press. <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781608712434.n1005>.

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002). Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism | Journal of Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65.

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York: Crown Publishing.

Levy, M. J. (1952). The Structure of Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Linz, J. J. (1978). Crisis, breakdown & reequilibration. In J. J. Linz & A. Stepan (Eds.), The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes (p. 130). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Linz, J. J. (1990). Transitions to Democracy. The Washington Quarterly, 13(3), 143–164.


Linz, J. J. (2000). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation : southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. Source: The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.

Mainwaring, S. (1989). Transitions to democracy and democratic consolidation: Theoretical and comparative issues (No. 130). Retrieved from <https://kellogg.nd.edu/sites/default/files/old_files/documents/130_0.pdf>.

Mainwaring, S., & Bizzarro, F. (2019). The Fates Of Third-Wave Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 99–113. <https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0008>.

Mainwaring, S., O’Donnell, G., & Valenzuela, J. S. (1992). Issues in democratic consolidation : the new South American democracies in comparative perspective. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Maltez, J. A. (2007). Metodologias da Ciência Política. Lisboa: ISCSP.

Maltez, J. A. (2018). Manual de Ciência Política: Teoria Geral da República. Lisboa: ISCSP.

Martins, M. M. (2010). Cidadania e Participação Política. Lisboa: ISCSP.

Moreira, A. (1997). Ciência Política. Coimbra: Almedina.

Morlino, L. (1998). Democracy between consolidation and crisis : parties, groups, and citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morlino, L. (2009). Are there hybrid regimes? Or are they just an optical illusion? European Political Science Review, 1(02), 273. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000198>.

Morlino, L., Berg-Schlosser, D., & Badie, B. (2017). Political science: a global perspective. London: Sage Publications.

Mounk, Y. (2018a). The people vs. democracy: why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mounk, Y. (2018b). The Undemocratic Dilemma. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 98–112.<https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0030>.

Norris, P. (2017). Is Western Democracy Backsliding? Diagnosing the Risks (Faculty Research Working Paper Series No. RWP17- 012). Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from <https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1514>.

O’Donnell, G. (1992). Transitions, Continuities, and Procedures. In S. Mainwaring, G. O’Donell, & J. S. Valenzuela (Eds.), Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective (pp. 17–56). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule. Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. (The John Hopkins University Press, Ed.). Baltimore.

Olson, M. (1963). Rapid Growth as a Destabilizing Force. The Journal of Economic History, 23(4), 529–552. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2116214>.

Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development : political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pye, L. W. (1958). The Non-Western Political Process. The Journal of Politics, 20(03), 468. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2127224>.

Pye, L. W. (1990). Political Science and the Crisis of Authoritarianism. American Political Science Review, 84(1), 3–19. <https://doi.org/10.2307/1963627>.

Ray, J. L. (1995). Democracy and international conflict: an evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

Ricci, D. M. (1984). The Tragedyo of Political Science; Politics, Scolarship, and Democracy. New Haven: Yale Univeristy Press.

Rostow, W. (1971). Politics and the stages of growth. University Press.

Runciman, D. (2018). How democracy ends. New York: Basic Books.

Russett, B. M., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating peace: democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.

Sartori, G. (1995). How Far Can Free Government Travel? Journal of Democracy, 6(3), 101–111. <https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0055>.

Schedler, A. (2002). The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36–50. <https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0031>.

Schedler, A. (Ed.). (2006). Electoral authoritarianism : the dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers.

Shils, E. (1960). Political Development in the New States. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 2(03), 265. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500000724>.

Varieties of Democracy Institute. (2020). Autocratization Surges - Resistance Grows; Democracy

Report 2020. Gothenburg. Retrieved from <https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/f0/5d/f05d46d8-626f-4b20-8e4e-53d4b134bfcb/democracy_report_2020_low.pdf>.

Voeten, E. (2016). Are People Really Turning Away from Democracy? SSRN Electronic Journal.<https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882878>.

Volpe, T. (2010). Modernization Theory. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Theory (pp. 895–899). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. <https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412958660.n288>.

Weart, S. R. (1998). Never at war: why democracies will not fight one another. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Zakaria, F. (1997). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22–43. <https://doi.org/10.2307/20048274>.

At the moment of the article submission, it is required to the author(s) declare to agree with the conditions and norms of Political Observer - Revista Potuguesa de Ciência Política, as well as guaranteeing the inedited and original character of the text submitted to scientific evolution. Thus, the author(s) declare to accept the instructions and conditions of publication of the journal, sharing with this the author’s rights, respecting the duties of copyright and ceding to the journal the rights over the first publication of the text in its printed and digital version.

The partial or integral publication and sharing of the text (in institutional repositories, book chapters, periodical publications, social media and professional platforms in the areas of science and research, among others) determines the quotation of the initial publication in the journal and the hyperlinking to the website of Political Observer - Revista Potuguesa de Ciência Política, resorting, to that effect, to the available information in the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) system.

Political Observer incentives the sharing and distribution of the work published by the authors in the journal, raising the impact factors and the number of registered quotes, this way contributing to an open (https://www.ciencia-aberta.pt/) and accessible science (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/).