Abstract
The study of social policies in Latin America has analyzed the institutional continuity-discontinuity process along the political-economic changes between models of international insertion. In this article, we examine the applicability of historical institutionalist analysis as a tool to understand the social sector policy sequence format in the Brazilian and Uruguayan cases between its beginnings and the 2010s.
References
Abbott, A. & Deviney, S. (1992). The Welfare State as Transnational Event: Evidence from Sequences of Policy Adoption, Social Science History, Vol. 16, No. 2, 245-274. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171289.
Amenta, E. (2003). What we know about the development of social policy: comparative and historical research in comparative and historical perspective, in James Mahoney & Dietrich Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803963.004.
Collier, R. B. (1999). Paths Toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625626.
Cortés, R. (2008). The Contemporary Social Policy Debate in Latin America, Global Social Policy, Vol. 8(1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018107086091.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Filgueira, F. (1998). El nuevo modelo de prestaciones sociales en América Latina: eficiencia, residualismo y ciudadanía estratificada, Centroamérica en reestructuración. Ciudadanía y política social. CLACSO, 71-116.
Filgueira, F. (2004). The Structural and Political Keys of the Reluctant Latin American Social State and its Interplay with Democracy: The Development, Crises and Aftermath of Universal, Dual and Exclusionary Social States. Brasil: UNRISD.
Ffrench-Davis, R. (2005). Reforming Latin America’s Economies: After Market Fundamentalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509900.
González, C. (2015). Social Policies in Contemporary Latin America: Families and Poverty in the Social Protection Systems, Social Sciences, nº 4, pp. 134-147.
Castles, F. G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H. e Pierson, C. (2010). “Introduction”, in Francis G. Castles, Stephan Leibfried, Jane Lewis, Herbert Obinger, e Christopher Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579396.001.0001.
Collier, D. e Collier, R. B. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Evans, P. B., Rueschemeier, D., Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628283.
Filgueira, F. (2004). The Structural and Political Keys of the Reluctant Latin American Social State and its Interplay with Democracy, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Genebra: UNRISD.
Haggard, S. e Kaufman, R. (2008). Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214153.
Hagopian, F. (1996). Traditional politics and regime change in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952224.
Hicks, A., Misra, J. e NG Tang Nah (1995). The Programmatic Emergence of the Social Security State, American Sociological Review, Vol. 60, 329- 349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096417.
Huber, E. e Stephens, J. D. (2011). Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Parties and Policies in Global Markets. London: The Chicago University Press.
Hunter, W. (2014), Making Citizens: Brazilian Social Policy from Getúlio to Lula, Journal of Politics in Latin America, no. 3, 15-37. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226356495.
Lavinas, L. (2013). 21st Century Welfare, New Left Review, 84, 5-40.
Mainwaring, S., O’Donnell, G. e Valenzuela, S. (1992), Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Malamud, A. (2009). Fragmentação e divergência na América Latina, Relações Internacionais, vol. 24, 61-73.
Mesa-Lago, C. (1978). Social Security in Latin America: Pressure Groups, Stratification, and Inequality. London: University of Pittsburgh University. https://doi.org/10.2307/2513259.
Mesa-Lago, C. (1994). La reforma de la seguridad social y las pensiones en América Latina, Serie Reformas de Política Pública 28, Santiago: CEPAL.
Mesa-Lago, C. (2012). Reassembling Social Security: A Survey of Pensions and Health Care Reforms in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/0.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199644612.001.0001.
Munck, G. (2007). Regimes and Democracy in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Patrício, R. (2012). Estudos de Área: América Latina. Lisboa: ISCSP.
Peters, B. G. (2005). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’, 2ª ed. London: Continuum.
Rhodes, R. W. (2009). Old Institutionalisms. In R. W. Rhodes, Sarah Binder e Bert Rockman, The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 90-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.001.0001.
Sanders, Elizabeth (2009). Historical Institutionalism. In R. W. Rhodes, Sarah Binder e Bert Rockman, The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.001.0001.
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Solimano, A. (2005). Reassessing Social Policies in Latin America: Growth, Middle Classes and Social Rights, Cepal Review 87.
At the moment of the article submission, it is required to the author(s) declare to agree with the conditions and norms of Political Observer - Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política, as well as guaranteeing the inedited and original character of the text submitted to scientific evolution. Thus, the author(s) declare to accept the instructions and conditions of publication of the journal, sharing with this the author’s rights, respecting the duties of copyright and ceding to the journal the rights over the first publication of the text in its printed and digital version.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The partial or integral publication and sharing of the text (in institutional repositories, book chapters, periodical publications, social media and professional platforms in the areas of science and research, among others) determines the quotation of the initial publication in the journal and the hyperlinking to the website of Political Observer - Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política, resorting, to that effect, to the available information in the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) system.
Political Observer incentives the sharing and distribution of the work published by the authors in the journal, raising the impact factors and the number of registered quotes, this way contributing to an open (https://www.ciencia-aberta.pt/) and accessible science (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/). Published works are under a Creative Commons License - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International .