Keywords
governance reforms
political legitimacy
public goods approach
regulatory mode
sovereignty
How to Cite
Abstract
The debate about the future of European governance revolves around three main questions: the finalité, i.e. the overall goals of integration; the attribution of competences between EU institutions and the member states; and differentiated integration. These questions rest on a diagnosis of the European malaise that highlights the clash between widening and deepening, i.e. the difficulty of reconciling the social, cultural, and political diversity within the Union of 27, and the degree of shared sovereignty that is required in order to properly manage the multifarious EU competences. Illustrating the case of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) and its far failed reform, the present contribution suggests a different interpretation of the institutional impasse that currently beset the EU. Such impasse results from the ongoing pursuit of a regulatory model of governance. Despite being meant to allow member states to keep control over the integration process, such a model results, instead, in a number of unintended constraints on member states’ political autonomy. Additionally, it also undermines the Union’s political legitimacy. The limits of the model become patent whenever common policy areas have redistributive implications. In these cases, of which the CEAS is a chief example, efficiency and joint responsibility for the achievement of common purposes go hand in hand. Focused on the prevention of externalities, the regulatory model is unable to solve the collective action problems that arise in such policy areas.
References
Buchanan, J.M. (1965). An Economic Theory of Clubs. Economica, 32(1), 1-14.
Chalmers, D., Davies, G. & Monti, G. (2010). European Union Law, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comissão Europeia (2015). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard, COM(2015) 671 final, Estrasburgo, 12 dezembro 2015 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/securing-eu-borders/legal-documents/docs/regulation_on_the_european_border_and_coast_guard_en.pdf> (Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
— (2016a). Recomendação de 10 de fevereiro de 2016, C(2016) 871 final [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/commission_recommendation_addressed_to_the_hellenic_republic_20160210_pt.pdf> (Acesso: 20 de dezembro de 2018).
— (2016b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the State of Play of Implementation of the Priority Actions under the European Agenda on Migration, Bruxelas, 10.2.2016 COM(2016) 85 final [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-85-EN-F1-1.PDF> (Acesso: 20 de dezembro de 2018).
— (2016c). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Towards a reform of the Common European Asylum System and Enhancing Legal Avenues to Europe, Bruxelas, 6.4.2016, COM(2016) 197 final [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/IT/1-2016-197-EN-F1-1.PDF> (Acesso: 20 de dezembro de 2018).
— (2016d). Evaluation of the Implementation of the Dublin III Regulation, Bruxelas, 18 de março de 2016 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/asylum/examination-of-applicants/docs/evaluation_of_the_implementation_of_the_dublin_iii_regulation_en.pdf> (Acesso: 20 de dezembro de 2018).
— (2016e). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, COM (2016) 466 final, Bruxelas, 13 julho 2016 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/homeaffairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160713/proposal_on_beneficiaries_of_international_protection_-_subsidiary_protection_eligibility_-_protection_granted_en.pdf> (Acesso: 20 dezembro de 2018).
— (2016f). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common procedure for international protection in the Union, COM(2016) 467 final, Bruxelas, 13 julho 2016 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160713/proposal_for_a_common_procedure_for_international_protection_in_the_union_en.pdf>(Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
— (2016g). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union Agency for Asylum and repealing Regulation (EU) No 439/2010, COM(2016) 271 final, Bruxelas, 4 maio 2016 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/IT/1-2016-271-EN-F1-1.PDF> (Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
— (2016h). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast), COM(2016) 270 final, Bruxelas, 4 maio 2016 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-270-EN-F1-1.PDF> (Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
— (2016i). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of [Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (recast), COM(2016) 272 final, Bruxelas, 4 maio 2016 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-272-EN-F1-1.PDF> (Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
— (2016j). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast), COM(2016) 465 final, Bruxelas, 13 julho 2016 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160713/proposal_on_standards_for_the_reception_of_applicants_for_international_protection_en.pdf> (Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
— (2016l). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council: Back to Schengen - A Roadmap, COM(2016) 120 final, 4 março 2016 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/communication-back-to-schengen-roadmap_en.pdf> (Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
— (2017a). White Paper on the Future of Europe, Bruxelas, 1 de março de 2017, COM(2017)2025 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf> (Acesso: 20 de dezembro de 2018).
— (2017b). Reflection Paper on Harnessing Globalisation, Bruxelas, 10 de Maio 2017, COM(2017) 240 [Online], <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/reflection-paper-globalisation_en.pdf> (Acesso: 20 de dezembro de 2018).
Conselho Europeu (2018). European Council Conclusions, 28 June 2018 [Online], <https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/06/29/20180628-euco-conclusions-final/pdf> (Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
Dølvik, J. E. & Martin, A., eds. (2017) European Social Models from Crisis to Crisis. Employment and Inequality in the Era of Monetary Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
European Parliament Research Service (2016). Migration and Asylum [Online], <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/infographics/migration/public/index.html?page=intro> (Acesso: 20 de dezembro de 2018).
Grimm, D. (2017). The Constitution of European Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hobbes, Th. (2012). Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil (1651), ed. by Noel Malcolm. Oxford: Clarendon Press of Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. (1991). Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch (1795). In Kant: Political Writings, 2nd edition, ed. by H.S. Reiss (pp. 93-130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kassim, H., Menon, A. (2003) The principal-agent approach and the study of the European Union: promise unfulfilled? Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 121–139.
Majone, G. (1998). Europe’s “Democratic Deficit”. The Question of Standards. European Law Journal, 4(1), 5-28.
— (2005). Dilemmas of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Menéndez, A.J. (2016). The Refugee Crisis: Between Human Tragedy and Symptom of the Structural Crisis of European Integration. European Law Journal, 22(4), 388-416. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–53.
— (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Revised ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Phelan, W. (2012). What Is Sui Generis About the European Union? Costly International Cooperation in a Self-Contained Regime. International Studies Review, 14(3), 367-385.
Thielemann, E. (2018). Why Refuge Burden-Sharing Initiatives Fail: Public Goods, Free-Riding and Symbolic Solidarity in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 63-82.
Thielemann, E. and Armstrong, C. (2013). Understanding European asylum cooperation under the Schengen/Dublin System: a public goods framework. European Security, 22(2), 148-164.
V4 Interior Ministers (2017). Joint Declaration of V4 Interior Ministers, Budapest, 5 October 2017 [Online], <http://www.visegradgroup.eu/calendar/selected-events-in-2017-170203/joint-declaration-of-v4> (Acesso: 20 dezembro 2018).
Weber, M. (1946). Politics as Vocation (1918). In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. by H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (pp. 77-128). New York: Oxford University Press.
At the moment of the article submission, it is required to the author(s) declare to agree with the conditions and norms of Political Observer - Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política, as well as guaranteeing the inedited and original character of the text submitted to scientific evolution. Thus, the author(s) declare to accept the instructions and conditions of publication of the journal, sharing with this the author’s rights, respecting the duties of copyright and ceding to the journal the rights over the first publication of the text in its printed and digital version.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The partial or integral publication and sharing of the text (in institutional repositories, book chapters, periodical publications, social media and professional platforms in the areas of science and research, among others) determines the quotation of the initial publication in the journal and the hyperlinking to the website of Political Observer - Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política, resorting, to that effect, to the available information in the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) system.
Political Observer incentives the sharing and distribution of the work published by the authors in the journal, raising the impact factors and the number of registered quotes, this way contributing to an open (https://www.ciencia-aberta.pt/) and accessible science (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/). Published works are under a Creative Commons License - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International .
