A Separação entre a Sociedade Civil e o Estado e a Crise do Estado Soberano


civil society
sovereign state crisis

How to Cite

Pires, S. (2020). A Separação entre a Sociedade Civil e o Estado e a Crise do Estado Soberano. Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa De Ciência Política, (12). https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2019.12/pp.17-34


The separation between civil society and the state is a product of modernity that is centered in the dichotomy between the public and the private spheres. Liberalism is marked by this separation which has underlied challenges to the role of the sovereign state in the last decades, resulting from the rise of neo-liberalism embodied in the processes of economic globalization based on liberal ideas of free trade, free movement of capital, deregulation and privatization. In order to understand this issue, it is inquired how the separation between the concepts of civil society and the state took place and why it is at the origin of the contemporary challenge to the role of the sovereign state. As such, the origin and evolution of the concept of civil society since Aristotle is traced and it is evidenced that, after the Aristotelian conception, modernity produced two conceptions of civil society, a liberal on the one hand, and a Marxist on the other. They underlie the respective political-ideological currents, whose clashes in political praxis had as a result the prevalence of the liberal perspective. This prevalence is pointed out as one of the main factors underlying the contemporary challenge to the role of the sovereign state and, consequently, its recent crisis, its impact on the processes of globalization and the complexification of international life is demonstrated and the ways in which these contribute to the challenge of the role of the State are illustrated.



Alves, A. A. (2006). Ordem, Liberdade e Estado: Uma reflexão crítica sobre a filosofia política em Hayek e Buchanan. Senhora da Hora: Edições Praedicare.

Arendt, H. (2001). A Condição Humana. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água Editores.

Balão, S. M. R. (2011). A Matriz do Poder: Uma visão analítica da Globalização e Anti-Globalização no Mundo Contemporâneo. Lisboa: MGI.

Bobbio, N. (1997). Democracy and Dictatorship. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chambers, S., & Kopstein, J. (2006). Civil Society and the State. Em J. S. Dryzek, B. Honig, & A. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory (pp. 363–381). Oxford:
Oxford University Press.

Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Ferguson, A. (1995). An Essay on the History of Civil Society. (F. Oz-Salzberger, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feser, E. (2003). Hayek on Tradition. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 17(1), 17–56.

Flinders, M. (2006). Public/Private: The Boundaries of the State. Em C. Hay, M. Lister, & D. Marsh (Eds.), The State: Theories and Issues (pp. 223–247). Basingstoke: Palgrave

Forst, R. (2007). Civil Society. Em R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, & T. Pogge (Eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (2.a, pp. 452–462). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: The Free Press.

Fukuyama, F. (2006). A Construção de Estados. Lisboa: Gradiva.

Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gray, J. (1995). Liberalism (2.a). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Gray, J. (1998). Hayek on Liberty (3.a). London: Routledge.

Gray, J. (2008). A Morte da Utopia. Lisboa: Guerra e Paz.

Harris, J. (2006). Development of Civil Society. Em R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A.

Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (pp. 131–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hayek, F. A. (1982). Law, Legislation and Liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. London: Routledge.

Hayek, F. A. (1991). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. (W. W. Bartley III, Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. (A. W. Wood, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Judt, T. (2011). Ill Fares the Land. London: Penguin Books.

Ketcham, R. L. (1958). James Madison and the Nature of Man. Journal of the History of Ideas, 19(1), 62–76.

Maltez, J. A. (1991). Ensaio Sobre o Problema do Estado. Lisboa: Academia Internacional da Cultura Portuguesa.

Maltez, J. A. (1996). Princípios de Ciência Política: Introdução à Teoria Política (2.a ed.). Lisboa: Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas.

Maltez, J. A. (2002). Curso de Relações Internacionais. São João do Estoril: Principia.

Maltez, J. A. (2018). Manual de Ciência Política: Teoria Geral da República. Lisboa: Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas.

Mandeville, B. (1988). The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Moreira, A. (2005). Teoria das Relações Internacionais (5.a ed.). Coimbra: Almedina.

Palmer, T. G. (2002). Classical Liberalism and Civil Society: Definitions, History, and Relations. Em N. L. Rosenblum & R. Post (Eds.), Civil Society and Government (pp. 48–78). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rachman, G. (2011). O Mundo de Soma Zero. Lisboa: Quetzal.

Scalet, S., & Schmidtz, D. (2002). State, Civil Society, and Classical Liberalism. Em N. L.

Rosenblum & R. C. Post (Eds.), Civil Society and Government (pp. 26–47). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Scruton, R. (2001). The Meaning of Conservatism (3.a). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Scruton, R. (2010). Breve História da Filosofia Moderna. Lisboa: Guerra e Paz.

Seligman, A. B. (1995). The Idea of Civil Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Smith, A. (1904). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. (E. Cannan,
Ed.). London: Methuen.

At the moment of the article submission, it is required to the author(s) declare to agree with the conditions and norms of Political Observer - Revista Potuguesa de Ciência Política, as well as guaranteeing the inedited and original character of the text submitted to scientific evolution. Thus, the author(s) declare to accept the instructions and conditions of publication of the journal, sharing with this the author’s rights, respecting the duties of copyright and ceding to the journal the rights over the first publication of the text in its printed and digital version.

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The partial or integral publication and sharing of the text (in institutional repositories, book chapters, periodical publications, social media and professional platforms in the areas of science and research, among others) determines the quotation of the initial publication in the journal and the hyperlinking to the website of Political Observer - Revista Potuguesa de Ciência Política, resorting, to that effect, to the available information in the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) system.

Political Observer incentives the sharing and distribution of the work published by the authors in the journal, raising the impact factors and the number of registered quotes, this way contributing to an open (https://www.ciencia-aberta.pt/) and accessible science (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/). Published works are under a Creative Commons License - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International .

Licença Creative Commons