Keywords
consolidation
democratisation
transition
How to Cite
Abstract
Most democratic transitions have demonstrated how it is possible to move from an authoritarian starting point towards an ongoing state of compromise. The Kingdom of Bhutan, a small state bordering India and China and located deep within the Himalayan Mountains, stands as an illustrative case of that paradigm. Not only has that country recently welcomed extensive democratic practices after a century of monarchical rule, but more interestingly, it did so by royal decree. This unusual top-down transition saw the ruling monarch effectively “enforcing” democracy onto the people rather than the opposite, which defied the customary paradigm of democratisation. Nonetheless, Bhutan’s process of democratisation has been hampered at an initial stage because most Bhutanese citizens remained satisfied with the previous monarchical regime. As such, the purpose of the communication is to enlighten the reader with the features of Bhutanese democracy and its preceding process of democratisation, while providing a possible answer on whether there is a common pattern in the transitional process of authoritarianism to democracy. In order to do so, the article firstly looks at Bhutan’s modern political history; secondly, it analyses the idiosyncrasies of Bhutanese democracy; and thirdly, it shows how the historical, religious and social background of Bhutan has led to a peculiar process of democratic consolidation.
References
Bertelsmann Stifung (BTI 2014). Bhutan Country Report. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Stifung.
Bertelsmann Stifung (BTI 2016). Bhutan Country Report. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Stifung.
Bhutan’s Road to Democracy – Interview to the Prime Minister of Bhutan. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from: <http://www.cfr.org/bhutan/bhutans-road-democracy/p17331> [accessed 30th September 2017].
Bhutan Final Report – National Assembly Elections. European Union Election Observation Unit. Retrieved from: <http://www.eods.eu/library/eu__eom_bhutan_2008_final_report.pdf> [accessed 29th September 2017].
Country Strategy Paper Bhutan 2007-2013. European Union External Action. Retrieved from: <http://eeas.europa.eu/bhutan/csp/07_13_en.pdf> [accessed 1th October 2017]
Diamond, L. (1995). Toward Democratic Consolidation. In L. Diamond & M. Plattner (Eds.), Economic Reform and Democracy (1st ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking % Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21-35. Retrieved from: <http://www.asu.edu/courses/pos350/diamond--Thinking%20about%20 Hybrid%20Regimes.pdf> [accessed 1st October 2017].
Freedom House Report on Bhutan (2003). Retrieved from: <https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2003/bhutan> [accessed 27th September 2017].
Freedom House Report on Bhutan (2009). Retrieved from: <https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2009/bhutan> [accessed 27th September 2017].
Freedom House Report on Bhutan (2014). Retrieved from: <https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2014/bhutan> [accessed 27th September 2017].
Freedom House Report on Bhutan (2016). Retrieved from: <https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2016/bhutan> [accessed 27th September 2017].
Gallenkamp, M. (2010). Democracy in Bhutan An Analysis of Constitucional Change in a Buddhist Monarchy. IPCS Research Papers. Retrieved from: <http://www.ipcs.org/pdf_file/issue/RP24-Marian-Bhutan.pdf> [accessed 29th September 2017].
Huntington, S. (1991). The Third Wave of Democratization. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12-34
Kaul, N. (2008, March 27). Bhutan is neither authoritarian nor stuck in a time warp. The Guardian. Retrieved from <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/mar/27/1> [acedido a 28.09.2017].
Masaki, K. (2013). Exploring Bhutan’s ‘Natural Democracy’: In Search of an Alternative View of Democracy. Journal of Bhutan Studies, 28, 47-72.
Muni, S. D. (2014). Bhutan’s Deferential Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 25(2), 158-163.
Phuntsho, K. (2008). Bhutan’s unique democracy: a first verdict. openDemocracy. Retrieved from <https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/institutions/bhutan_s_unique_democracy_a_first_verdict> [acedido a 29.09.2017].
Ramesh, R. (2008, March 25). Voters flock to Gross National Happiness. The Guardian. Retrieved from <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/mar/25/1> [acedido a 28.09.2017].
Sinpeng, A. (2007). Democracy from Above: Regime Transition in the Kingdom of Bhutan. Journal of Bhutan Studies, 17, 21-47.
Schmitter, P. C. (1996a). Dangers and Dilemmas of Democracy. In L. Diamond & M. Plattner (Eds.) The Global Resurgence of Democracy (2nd ed.). Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Schmitter, P. C. (1996b). What Democracy Is and Is Not. In L. Diamond & M. Plattner (Eds.) The Global Resurgence of Democracy (2nd ed.). Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sinpeng, A. (2007). Democracy from Above: Regime Transition in the Kingdom of Bhutan. Journal of Bhutan Studies, 17, 21-47.
The Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan. Retrieved from: <http://www.bhutanaudit.gov.bt/About%20Us/Mandates/Constitution%20of%20Bhutan%202008.pdf> [accessed 28th September 2017].
The World Factbook – Bhutan. Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved from: <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/print_bt.html> [accessed 2nd October 2017].
Tourism Council of Bhutan – Society. Retrieved from: <http://www.tourism.gov.bt/about-bhutan/society> [accessed 30th September 2017].
Tourism Council of Bhutan – Political System of Bhutan. Retrieved from: <http://www.tourism.gov.bt/about-bhutan/political-system-of-bhutan> [accessed 30th September 2017].
Turner, M, Chuki, S. & Tshering, J. (2011). Democratization by decree: the case of Bhutan. Democratization, 18(1), 184-210. Retrieved from: <http://www.rim.edu.bt/10/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/TURNER-DEMOCRATIZATION-BY-DECREE.pdf> [accessed 1st October 2017].
At the moment of the article submission, it is required to the author(s) declare to agree with the conditions and norms of Political Observer - Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política, as well as guaranteeing the inedited and original character of the text submitted to scientific evolution. Thus, the author(s) declare to accept the instructions and conditions of publication of the journal, sharing with this the author’s rights, respecting the duties of copyright and ceding to the journal the rights over the first publication of the text in its printed and digital version.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The partial or integral publication and sharing of the text (in institutional repositories, book chapters, periodical publications, social media and professional platforms in the areas of science and research, among others) determines the quotation of the initial publication in the journal and the hyperlinking to the website of Political Observer - Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política, resorting, to that effect, to the available information in the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) system.
Political Observer incentives the sharing and distribution of the work published by the authors in the journal, raising the impact factors and the number of registered quotes, this way contributing to an open (https://www.ciencia-aberta.pt/) and accessible science (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/). Published works are under a Creative Commons License - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International .
